Leaders are struggling to retain
talented younger employees. Many leaders are quick to decry what they see as Generation
Y’s lack of loyalty and commitment. As I’ve noted elsewhere though,
generational differences are often overstated and don’t necessarily help in
predicting or explaining individual preferences. However it’s easy to see how the
corporate downsizing that has impacted family and friends has taught this
generation that employee loyalty may not be reciprocated by employers. Add to
this Generation Y's high levels of education and mobility, and you have a recipe for high turnover.
So is it all about bean bags, bright
colours and free food? Well, making offices more ‘cool’ only goes so far. Some
organisations try to take these surface elements (from organisations that are
known for their ability to attract and retain Gen Y’s) and inject them into
their own offices. Like all transplants though, they’re often rejected. Cool
offices are an outworking of the culture of organisations – they’re not the
driver of the culture. Likewise pay doesn't guarantee longer tenure – you can
read more about why here.
There is a practical way to help retain
Generation Y employees. While it sounds counterintuitive, helping workers to
grow and build their CV can make them more likely to stay with your
organisation. 'Mastery', or developing additional skills and experience, is a
major source of workplace motivation (see more here). As a manager, you can
consciously help your people to develop skills and experience that
matter to them. In addition, you can help employees to recognise the
development and progress that they are making.
During your regular meetings with your
people, make sure you set aside some time to identify what further development
is of interest. Also spend time looking back at the previous month or quarter
to identify the new skills and experience that they have gained. Help them to
summarise this experience in a way that will fit into a CV or LinkedIn profile.
By highlighting and increasing their
employability, you will be able to demonstrate the value staying with the
organisation will have on their development. And the approach also works across
all employees. For example, as people approach retirement, providing them with skills that
will help them to pick up part time roles (if that's what they want) will also
be attractive.
Achieving this at an organisational
level requires managers who can have skilled discussions with employees. This
is likely to involve some investment in skill development for managers as well.
But, as we’ve seen, this development may also help to retain your managers.
Nice article, and in essence I agree, but aren't these conflicting interests ? By "increasing their employability" aren't you simply readying them to move on as opposed to encouraging them to stay ?
ReplyDeleteor... are you saying that the increase in employability simply means preparedness for promotion within the same organisation ?
I am battling with this kind of thing at the moment where I want my staff to be able to realise their career plans but if that happens it means that, as a team leader, I keep going back to square one to replace them. Great in principle but practically it leads to peaks and troughs of performance for the overall team
Anyway, thanks for the article, where did you get the nice striped shirt, it's a doozy ?
Thanks for the comments and I'm glad you enjoyed the blog (if not the shirt!). I don't see this approach accelerating the movement of people through teams (although that may occur in some instances). If you focus on expanding roles as people develop, you may even be able to retain people longer and increase their contribution to the team. And I do believe this approach leads to people wanting to stay with the organisation longer, provided there is an openness to move people between roles. Once you build a reputation as a manager who invests time in developing people, you're also likely to find it easier to attract new people to your team when vacancies do arise. Having helped team members to move into bigger and better opportunities, I've shared your concerns about the short-term impacts on performance when great people move on. I believe that's better than them moving on due to a lack of challenge or development though.
Delete